INTRODUCTION: Acrochordons are very prevalent in dermatological offices and can reach almost 60% of the population over 70. One possible therapeutic approach is contact cryotherapy.
OBJECTIVES: Compare pain tolerance, aesthetic results, and the preference of participants for electrocoagulation or contact cryotherapy techniques in the treatment of acrochordons.
METHODS: Ten participants, with at least four acrochordons each, had their lesions divided into two groups. One group was submitted to electrocoagulation and the other to contact cryotherapy. We measured pain tolerance using the analog pain scale (EAD). The aesthetic result was assessed by visual comparison between the treatment groups in each participant, and the patient’s preference was evaluated by asking the participant objectively.
RESULTS: All points analyzed had statistical significance. The participants gave lower scores in EAD for lesions submitted to contact cryotherapy. The esthetic result evaluated after 30 days was superior in the lesions of the electrocoagulation group. All participants preferred the contact cryotherapy technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Contact cryotherapy is the preferred method with better pain tolerance in treating acrochordons, but the aesthetic result was better with electrocoagulation.

Keywords: Cryosurgery; Cryotherapy; Electrocoagulation; Electrosurgery; Fibroma

Cryosurgery is a technique widely known and used among dermatologists. Intralesional application is already used to treat keloids and has the advantage of restricting the zone of action of low temperatures of liquid nitrogen. The use of contact cryosurgery in vascular lesions is well reported in the literature, but there are no intralesional technique publications on these types of lesions. Here, we report two cases, one of port-wine stain hamartomas in a 61-year-old patient and another of a cherry angioma in a 70-year-old patient, safely and satisfactorily treated with intralesional cryosurgery.

Keywords: Cryosurgery; Cryotherapy; Hamartoma; Hemangioma; Vascular malformations

INTRODUCTION: The perioral region is commonly affected by non-melanoma skin cancer. Mohs micrographic surgery is the treatment of choice in this area because it has the highest cure rate and preserves healthy tissue. Several methods are available for restoring the perioral region, and their selection is influenced by the surgical wound characteristics and the surgeon's preference.
OBJECTIVE: Describe the authors’ experience in perioral reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery and analyze the repair methods most frequently performed.
METHODS: Retrospective study of consecutive cases submitted to Mohs surgery and perioral reconstruction.
RESULTS: The study included 108 cases from 103 patients. The mean number of Mohs surgery stages was 1.4, and the mean defect size was 16 mm. Primary closure was the most used technique for reconstruction, followed by flaps (mainly V-Y, single advancement, and rotation). The association of repair methods was used in 28.7% of cases, mostly combined with flaps. Four patients had complications (necrosis and graft infection, trapdoor effect, and partial wound dehiscence).
CONCLUSION: Primary closure was the most frequent repair method, followed by flaps. Knowing reconstruction strategies and possibilities of associations is essential for proper restoration of the perioral region, maintaining its functionality, sensitivity and aesthetics.

Keywords: Lip; Lip neoplasms; Mohs surgery; Skin neoplasms