Gaston Galimberti1, Damian Ferrario1, Gabriela Ribeiro Casabona1, Leiza Molinari1
Keywords: MOHS SURGERY, SURGICAL FLAPS, ZYGOMA
Flaps consist of the movement of an area of skin—adjacent
to, or not adjacent to a defect to be repaired—which is nourished
by its own vascular pedicle. They can be classified into four
types, according to the movement of the skin towards the receiving
area: advancement, rotation, transposition, and interpolation.
1-3 That classification takes into account only the flap''''''''s main
movement. In many situations, two types of movements must be
performed in order to achieve superior functional and aesthetic
results—for example the combination of the advancement and
the rotation movements, as proposed in the present article. The
malar region is a facial aesthetical unit that resembles an inverted
triangle, which lends symmetry and volume to the face. It is
superiorly delimited by the lower eyelid, laterally by the preauricular
region and medially by the nose''''''''s lateral region, which
extends along the nasolabial fold. The abundant neurovascular
network, and the mobility and volume provided by this region''''''''s
subcutaneous tissue are unique features that allow the implementation
of various flap types.4-9 The repair of the upper malar
region nevertheless requires special attention to certain items,
such as:
The present paper proposes a unipediculated advancement and rotation flap for repairing defects located in the upper and medial portions of the malar region. It is possible to restore the region''''''''s volume using adjacent skin with similar characteristics, placing the tension point in the lateral region of the nose.
The proposed flap was performed on 15 patients at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina, following Mohs Micrographic surgery (MMS) that had resulted in medium and large surgical defects located in the upper or central malar region.
A) Drawing the flap
1) Primary Triangle: the surgical wound (A) is included in
a triangle whose base is located on the nasal wall, with the other
two sides touching the defect and intersecting in the lateral
region, forming a tip (B); it is crucial to identify the tension lines
and the orbital rim.
2) Incision movement: A caudal incision is carried out starting
at the triangle''''''''s base (C), continuing along the nasogenian
fold, observing a margin of at least 3mm from the nasal ala in order
to keep the physiological space between the aesthetic units.The
incision must reach the muscular layer, taking care to avoid severing
the external maxillary and angular arteries. As a significant
movement is often required, the longer the incision the greater the
movement achieved. As a result, the incision should go down to
the labial commissure, where the unloading triangle—which can
be performed in several ways and sizes according to the necessary
movement of the flap—is drawn (D). 10 (Figures 1 and 2)
3) Drawing the caudal Burow''''''''s triangle
When performing the flap''''''''s advancement-rotation movement,
two challenges arise: the excess of skin in the caudal
region and the lower portion''''''''s resistance. In order to resolve
these issues, the authors propose removing a second defect in
the lower portion before moving the flap, as described below:4,5,8
A) Classic form: a triangle (whose base would correspond
to the extension of the movement incision) is removed from the
caudal region of the flap. The greater the vertical axis of the
defect, the greater the triangle will be (Figures 1 and 3).
B) Inverted Burow''''''''s Triangle: a triangle is removed from
the caudal region of the flap. This type of triangle (inverted)
generates greater upward mobility, however the resulting scar is
less aesthetic (Figures 2 and 2).
C) Retrograde cut: this is an unloading incision, which
confers greater mobility to the flap (Figure 3).
D) Zetaplasty: this is used when the skin is very saggy,
however there is the necessity for a longer horizontal vector
(Figures 3 and 4).
4) Moving the flap
Before moving the flap, dissection followed by meticulous
hemostasis must be carried out, keeping it in a deep plane, near
its pedicle. Then the tip of the flap is tractioned with a hook
attached to the dermis, raising it up (like a tent) until reaching
an angle formed between the base and the top side of the primary
triangle.7 (Figure 4)
5) Suture
The proposed flap''''''''s suture is an important step in preventing
the traction of the palpebral region and secondary ectropion.
Three sutures in a "U" shape are carried out starting from
the flap''''''''s lower region, in the deep subcutaneous tissue (Points 1,2, and 3) with 4.0 absorbable suture. These points decrease the
space created by the detachment, as well as the tension arising
from the anchoring of the subcutaneous tissue in its new bed,
transferring the tension to the base in the nose''''''''s lateral area.
When the defect is tangent to the lower eyelid, a further point
(Point5, Figure 5), attaches the malar fat to the periosteal border, aiming at decreasing the vertical tension in the
eyelid.1,2Next, a 5.0 absorbable suture is used for a dermal
suture starting in the caudal region and ascending along the
nose''''''''s lateral area (Point 4). Finally, the skin must be sutured
with 5.0 or 6.0 non-absorbable suture. (Figure 5)
Three of the 15 patients progressed with palpebral edema, ectropion, and tent effect in the lateral region of the nose. The others progressed without sequelae and imperceptible aesthetic scarring in the 12-month follow-up (Figures 6 and 7).
The advancement and rotation flap is one of the options
for the reconstruction of the malar region, with the following
advantages:
This hybrid unipediculated advancement and rotation flap is an interesting surgical option for the correction of medium and large-sized defects in the upper malar region. The present study has shown that the technique can be performed and reproduced, nevertheless a greater number of cases must be studied in order to obtain greater statistical significance of success and complications.
1 . Harris G. Non margina defects of the lower eyelid, cheek, and lateral canthal region. In:Harris G. Atlas of Oculofacial Reconstruction: Principles and Techniques for the Repair of Periocular Defects. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009
2 . Krishnan R, Garman M, Nunez-Gussman J, Orengo I. Advancement Flaps: A Basic Theme with Many Variations. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(8 pt 2): 986-94
3 . Pérez Santos S, Marengo Otero R, González-Beato Merino MJ, Gar- cía Morrás P, Bueno Marco C, Lázaro Ochaita P. Colgajos de avance con triángulo de Burow en la cara. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2002;93(10): 602-6
4 . Gormley DE. A brief analysis of the Burrow''s wedge/triangle principle. J Dermatol Surg Oncol.1985;11(2):121-3
5 . Suzuki S., Matsuda K., Nishimura Y. Proposal for a new comprehensive classification of V-Y plasty and its analogues: the pros and cons of inverted versus ordinary Burow''s triangle excision. Plast Reconstr Surg.1996; 98(6):1016-22
6 . Bennett RG. Local skin flaps on the cheeks. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1991;17(2):161-5
7 . Boggio P, Gattoni M, Zanetta R, Leigheb G. Burow''s triangle advancement flaps for excision of two closely approximated skin lesions. Dermatol Surg., 1999;25(8):622-5
8 . Shan R. Baker MD. Local Flaps in Facial Reconstruction. 2da edición. Editorial: Mosby- Elsevier; 2007
9 . Randall K. Roenigk, John Louis Ratz, Henry H. Roenigk Jr. Roenigk''s Dermatologic Surgery. Current Techniques in Procedural Dermatology. 3ra edición. Editorial: Informa Healthcare; 2006
10 . Galimberti G, Ferrario D, Molinari L, Jácome L, Galimberti R. Colgajo de avance: doble triángulo de Burow. Una opción para cierres de defectos faciales. Dermatol Argent. 2012,18(1): 72-5