Randomized study comparing onabotulinum toxin diluted in lidocaine and epinephrine versus saline solution for the treatment of periocular lines

Introduction: Standard dilution of botulinum toxin is performed with 0.9% saline solution. Some studies show that when diluted in lidocaine and epinephrine, the toxin preserves its function without compromising effectiveness or safety.
Objective: To establish whether the paralyzing effect of ona-toxin type A reconstituted in anesthetic (2% lidocaine) and vasoconstrictor agent (1: 50,000 epinephrine) is as effective as that of the same toxin reconstituted in saline solution, at 48 hours, 1 week, 2, 4, 12 and 24 weeks, for the treatment of periocular lines. To compare the tolerance to pain between the two reconstitution alternatives.
Methods: Fifteen patients with periocular wrinkles were randomized to receive onabotulinum toxin diluted in lidocaine with epinephrine or in saline. Re-evaluations were carried out in 48 hours, 1 week, 2, 4, 12 and 24 weeks.
Results: The data indicate that there was no difference in the symmetry and durability of the botulinum toxin, nor in the pain during the application.
Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of lateral periocular muscle paralysis and symmetry resulting from the applications of onabotulinum toxin reconstituted in lidocaine with epinephrine or in saline solution. This outcome is consistent with those of previous studies.

Keywords: BOTULINUM TOXINS, TYPE A; DILUTION; LIDOCAINE