Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of andiroba oil in burns caused by hair removal with intense pulsed light: a prospective, comparative and double-blind study

Introduction: Intense pulsed light is commonly used for hair removal. Corticosteroids of low or medium potency are generally employed for pain and inflammatory reaction relief following such procedures. Botanical compounds, such as andiroba oil emulsion, have been proven to have moisturizing and anti-inflammatory effects. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of andiroba oil emulsion to desonide as an option to topical corticosteroids. Methods: A prospective, comparative, double-blind study evaluated nine female patients who underwent air removal with intense pulsed light in the inguinal region. The patients were treated immediately after the procedure with desonide on one side and andiroba oil emulsion on the other. The patients rated the pain sensation using a visual analog pain scale, and an observer dermatologist physician evaluated the inflammatory reaction caused by the procedure, comparing the two sides blindly. Results: There were no significant differences in pain relief or inflammation between the two products. The analgesic and anti-inflammatory potential of andiroba oil emulsion practically equaled that of desonide. Conclusions: This pilot study''''''''s results indicate that andiroba oil emulsion can be a treatment option following photoepilation.

Keywords: BURNS, HAIR REMOVAL, THERAPEUTICS, GLUCOCORTICOIDS, WETTING AGENTS